Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 407 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i3-8300 - 35 vs 62 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 8% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3930T - 345 vs 320 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i3-8300
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
42.12144504227518%
Multi-Core
948
24.784313725490197%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 62 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
