Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2093 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 129% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G3930 - 587 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 32 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €470.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75485 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
20.450723175243862%
Multi-Core
1043
5.188796577284712%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |