Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500K outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2500K is 2186 days older than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Celeron G3930 - 178 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i5-2500K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
94.11764705882352%
Multi-Core
1043
54.29463820926601%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
