Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1583 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-3240T - 228 vs 223 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
73.51973684210526%
Multi-Core
971
93.09683604985618%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
