Buy on Amazon
€199.5
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1213 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 14% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G3930 - 115 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
115
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10320 (Basistakt: 3,80GHZ; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110320 Black
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13731 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
