Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 358 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 51 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Saints Row than Celeron G3900 - 154 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
148
96.1038961038961%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56317 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
59.285714285714285%
Multi-Core
992
15.196078431372548%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |