Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 427 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 10% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G1840 - 226 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Core i5-6400
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
45.45454545454545%
Multi-Core
854
28.250082699305324%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
