Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3690 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 60% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G1820 - 281 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 32 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €35.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76347 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
16.258278145695364%
Multi-Core
825
4.51559934318555%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |