Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 2148 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i9-10940X - 53 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 13% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G1820 - 253 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 28 vs 2 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
224
88.53754940711462%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5085 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
31.434058898847635%
Multi-Core
825
7.6608784473953015%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i9-10940X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Haswell | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |