Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 2417 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 99% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - €35.91 vs €2846.24
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 53 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 6% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G1820 - 315 vs 297 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 64 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for €35.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77845 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
315
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€2846.24
1%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,846.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77845 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
29.667673716012082%
Multi-Core
825
5.658824336374237%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 32 |
2 | Threads | 64 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |