Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1620 outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1620 is 92 days newer than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
355
86.79706601466992%
Multi-Core
606
83.81742738589212%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Pentium G645T |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
