Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4765T outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4765T is 181 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Performs up to 31% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G1620 - 92 vs 70 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-4765T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
44.84649122807017%
Multi-Core
723
24.83682583304706%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-4765T |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
