Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770S outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770S is 218 days older than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770S - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Performs up to 7% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G1620 - 469 vs 439 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770S |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |