Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3470T outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3470T is 185 days older than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470T
- Performs up to 2% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G1620 - 191 vs 187 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-3470T
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
72.38938053097344%
Multi-Core
723
63.70044052863436%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-3470T |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
