Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1620 outperforms Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1620 is 827 days newer than Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i3-560 - 55 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-560
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
92.32505643340858%
Multi-Core
723
77.57510729613733%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-560 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2010 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Clarkdale |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 73 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
