Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is 3102 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
- Performs up to 45% better in Rust than Celeron G1620 - 220 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
20.942140296979005%
Multi-Core
723
8.908329226219813%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Cezanne |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
