Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4850HQ outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4850HQ is 147 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i7-4850HQ - 35 vs 47 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4850HQ
- Performs up to 7% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1610T - 336 vs 314 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 8 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-4850HQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i7-4850HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Crystal Well |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 5200 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
