Buy on Amazon
€95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $109
Availability
MSRP in USD: $109
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 3684 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 16% better in God of War than Celeron G1610T - 187 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 8 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Core™ 13. Generation i3-13100F Desktop Prozessor (4 Core (4 P-Core), 12 MB Cache, up to 4,5 GHz, LGA1700)
Buy for €95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65531 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-13100F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
338
14.837576821773485%
Multi-Core
594
7.673427205787366%
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.