Buy on Amazon
€158.52
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2407 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 16% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G1610T - 180 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 16 vs 2 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
180
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X Prozessor, 4GHz AM4 36MB Cache Wraith Prism
Buy for €158.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Celeron G1610T or Ryzen 7 3700X
No Man's Sky, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
115 FPS
€12.17/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Ryzen 7 3700X
8 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€1,399
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
