Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2103 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Celeron G1610T - 194 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 4 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |