Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9980XE outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9980XE is 2146 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-9980XE - 55 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9980XE doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9980XE
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1610 - 159 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 36 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i9-9980XE
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i9-9980XE |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 18 |
| 2 | Threads | 36 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
