Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4590 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4590 is 514 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i5-4590 - 55 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590
- Performs up to 13% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G1610 - 102 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-4590
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
37.83303730017762%
Multi-Core
739
23.53503184713376%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-4590 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
