Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3570 is 185 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 55 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Performs up to 2% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G1610 - 111 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-3570
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
64.9390243902439%
Multi-Core
739
38.409563409563404%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-3570 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
