Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 91 days newer than Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-3330 - 55 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
76.75675675675676%
Multi-Core
739
44.97869750456482%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |