Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4053 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Resident Evil Village than Celeron G1610 - 313 vs 291 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-14400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
18.127659574468087%
Multi-Core
739
6.505854388590544%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
