Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 456 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G530 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Celeron G530 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
189
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |