Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1492 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Celeron G1610 - 679 vs 672 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
70.06578947368422%
Multi-Core
739
70.85330776605944%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
