Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2780 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 55 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 9% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G1610 - 119 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
119
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€999.9
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €999.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76534 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
25.41766109785203%
Multi-Core
739
5.982352464988263%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |