Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 2129 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 55 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 3% better in Resident Evil Village than Celeron G1610 - 299 vs 291 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 48 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
34.493927125506076%
Multi-Core
739
9.977048737680573%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 48 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 250 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
