Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2103 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G1610 - 235 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
47.91901012373454%
Multi-Core
739
39.795368874528805%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
