Key Differences
In short — Pentium G645 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G645 is 1 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Pentium G645 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645
- Performs up to 0% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron B830 - 211 vs 210 FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron B830
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Pentium G645
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Pentium G645 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
