Key Differences
In short — Core i7-860 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-860 is 1089 days older than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Performs up to 2% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron B830 - 188 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 8 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45.78
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €45.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8346 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |