Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2300X outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2300X is 2200 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2300X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 2300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2300X
- Performs up to 16% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron B830 - 229 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 4 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Celeron B830
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Ryzen 3 2300X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
