Buy on Amazon
€290.43
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 1705 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 8% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron B820 - 337 vs 312 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 7 1700
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
337
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€290.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Prozessor mit Wraith-Spire-LED-Kühler
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron B820
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Ryzen 7 1700
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
