Buy on Amazon
€75.15
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6400 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6400 is 3042 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 35 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron B815 - 121 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Intel Pentium Gold G6400 Processor 4 GHz 4 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €75.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65401 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Celeron B815
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Pentium Gold G6400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.