Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3460 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3460 is 932 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Pentium G3460 - 35 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3460
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Celeron B815 - 112 vs 108 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €41.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65463 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Pentium G3460 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |