Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 2466 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 35 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 22 than Celeron B815 - 272 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 48 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron B815
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 48 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 250 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
