Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11260H outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11260H is 3614 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11260H
- Performs up to 16% better in F1 22 than Celeron 847 - 281 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 12 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Core i5-11260H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i5-11260H |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 17 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
