Key Differences
In short — Core i7-960 outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-960 is 2632 days older than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i7-960 - 15 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-960 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-960
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron 3865U - 168 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 8 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€494.67
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €494.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i7-960 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 20th, 2009 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |