Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6950X outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6950X is 217 days older than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Performs up to 15% better in New World than Celeron 3865U - 112 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 20 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron 3865U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7-6950X
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i7-6950X |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
