Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 1550 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 15 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 50% better in War Thunder than Celeron 3205U - 183 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 12 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Xeon E |
Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 45 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
No | Overclockable | No |