Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 3235 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 33% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron 3205U - 128 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 16 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Core i5-14400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 15 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
