Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2866 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 15 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 46% better in Valorant than Celeron 3205U - 978 vs 670 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 32 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
978
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1199
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |