Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is 3070 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D - 15 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
- Performs up to 20% better in Deathloop than Celeron 3205U - 200 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 32 vs 2 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
Mobile • Jul 27th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
