Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 2463 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 17 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 86% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron 1037U - 401 vs 216 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 24 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €415.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65285 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Single-Core
310
18.507462686567163%
Multi-Core
513
4.520222045995242%
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |