Key Differences
In short — Celeron 1037U outperforms Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron 1037U is 342 days newer than Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 17 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 8 vs 2 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron 1037U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
