Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 2977 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400 - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than Celeron 1037U - 127 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 12 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron 1037U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i5-11400
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
