Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1444 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 17 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron 1037U - 251 vs 250 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron 1037U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1037U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Single-Core
310
50.98684210526315%
Multi-Core
513
49.18504314477469%
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
