Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2359 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron 1037U - 172 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 8 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
172
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €88.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |