Buy on Amazon
€191.69
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $219
Availability
MSRP in USD: $219
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1542 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron 1037U - 126 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 12 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
126
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€191.69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD CPU Ryzen 5 1600 AM4
Buy for €191.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron 1037U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Celeron 1037U or Ryzen 5 1600
Assassin's Creed Odyssey, 1920 x 1080, Ultra High
19 FPS
€46.12/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Ryzen 5 1600
8 GB, 240 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€876.36
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
